ZH Dr Zool Hilmi

Journal spotlight · Mattana et al. · Cancer Treatment Reviews

mCRPC: Choosing Lu-177 PSMA or Cabazitaxel

The decision depends on the patient's health and the cancer's imaging pattern.

Review published 21 September 2026 · Explanation updated 6 October 2026
Educational pathway comparing Lu-177 PSMA and cabazitaxel in progressive mCRPC, assessing clinical fitness, kidney function, marrow reserve, PSMA expression and FDG-positive PSMA-negative disease
Educational decision aid supplied by Dr Zool Hilmi, informed by the treatment-sequencing evidence reviewed by Mattana et al. (2026). This is an original educational synthesis, not a figure reproduced from that paper or the Ranjan et al. imaging review. Select the image to view it at full size.

Citation for this treatment pathway

Mattana F, Palesandro E, Dragonetti V, Curigliano G, Tucci M, Ceci F.

Optimizing the treatment pathway in post-docetaxel mCRPC: PSMA-RLT vs cabazitaxel. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2026;150:103216. Published online 21 September 2026.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2026.103216 · PMID: 42800445

The infographic is an original educational synthesis informed by this review and its evidence framework; it is not an original figure reproduced from the journal article.

What is this pathway about?

mCRPC means metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: cancer that has spread and is progressing despite testosterone being kept at a very low level. Lu-177 PSMA delivers radiation to cancer expressing the PSMA target. Cabazitaxel is a chemotherapy drug.

This infographic helps organise a discussion when both treatments are possible options. Its branches are a practical teaching framework; treatment eligibility and sequencing still require individual assessment.

How to follow the diagram

  1. Start with the patient's overall condition

    Consider daily activity, symptoms, how quickly the cancer is progressing, previous treatments and the patient's priorities. A fitter patient may have the opportunity to receive several treatments in sequence. Frailty or rapidly progressing disease may limit those opportunities.

  2. Check kidney function and blood counts

    Kidney function, urinary obstruction and bone-marrow reserve influence treatment safety. Blood counts help assess the ability to tolerate treatment. Reversible problems should be addressed, with specialist discussion when reserve is limited.

  3. Look at PSMA uptake across the cancer sites

    Strong, fairly consistent PSMA uptake supports consideration of PSMA-targeted therapy. Mixed uptake means some sites express the target more strongly than others. Significant low-uptake or PSMA-negative disease may need a different systemic approach.

  4. Use FDG PET when it can answer an additional question

    An FDG-positive but PSMA-negative lesion is active cancer without a clear PSMA target. This mismatch can signal disease that PSMA-targeted therapy may not adequately treat. FDG PET is useful in selected situations; it is not mandatory for every patient.

What do ES 0–3 mean?

The expression score compares tumour uptake with normal reference tissues on PSMA PET. Blood pool means activity in the blood; the parotid is a salivary gland near the ear.

Visual PSMA expression categories shown in the infographic
ScoreTumour uptakePlain-language meaning
ES 0Below blood poolVery little visible PSMA uptake
ES 1At least blood pool, below liverLow uptake
ES 2At least liver, below parotidIntermediate uptake
ES 3At least parotidHigh uptake

The score describes imaging; it does not prescribe treatment. The team also considers lesion size, distribution, tracer characteristics, disease outside the PSMA-positive sites and treatment-specific eligibility criteria.

Reading the treatment branches carefully

The infographic's “favour” and “consider” labels indicate topics for a clinical discussion. They do not guarantee a response or establish the best treatment order for every patient. Cabazitaxel also requires sufficient fitness and blood counts; poor marrow reserve does not automatically make chemotherapy safer.

Kidney thresholds in the diagram are simplified. The EANM/SNMMI guideline notes limited experience when GFR is 30–50 mL/min and recommends careful monitoring. Apply the current product information, local protocols and multidisciplinary judgement.

What does the supporting imaging review add?

Ranjan and colleagues review how imaging can support patient selection, response assessment and follow-up during Lu-177 PSMA therapy. PSMA PET/CT is central; FDG PET, post-treatment SPECT/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI can provide complementary information. Imaging findings should be interpreted alongside symptoms, blood tests and treatment history.

This is a critical review, rather than a new trial validating the supplied infographic. The authors also discuss imaging biomarkers and prediction models, while recognising the need for further validation.

For the direct treatment comparison, TheraP was a randomised phase II trial in selected patients. Lu-177 PSMA-617 produced more PSA responses than cabazitaxel, but longer follow-up found similar overall survival between the randomised groups. The diagram should therefore not be read as proof that one treatment always prolongs life more than the other.

Supporting imaging review and full PDF

Aditi Ranjan, Minal Padden-Modi, Hoda Abdel-Aty, Joao Galante, Simon Wan, Azzra Maricar, Adetokunbo Adesina, Brent Drake, Siraj Yusuf, Gary Cook, Nicholas James, Sola Adeleke.

The role of multimodality imaging in selection, response assessment, and follow-up of patients receiving 177Lutetium-PSMA-therapy. Insights into Imaging. 2026;17:13. Published 16 January 2026.

DOI: 10.1186/s13244-025-02151-x

Read the full 18-page paper on this page

If your browser does not show the document, use the Read full PDF button above.

The complete publisher PDF is reproduced unchanged under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. © The Author(s) 2026. The explanation and supplied infographic are separate educational material.